Free Download Genesis Framework Hypothesis

The documentary hypothesis DH is one of three models used to explain the origins and composition of the first five books of the Bible, called collectively the Torah. Pure myth That is todays typical view of a literal Adam and Eve. Yet, contrary to current skepticism, a real Adam and Eve remain credibleboth in. Documentary hypothesis Wikipedia. The documentary hypothesis DH is one of three models used to explain the origins and composition of the first five books of the Bible, called collectively the Torah or Pentateuch, the other two being the supplementary hypothesis and the fragmentary hypothesis. Note 1 All three agree that the Torah is not a unified work from a single author traditionally Moses but is made up of sources combined over many centuries by many hands. They differ on the nature of these sources and how they were combined. According to the documentary hypothesis there were four sources, each originally a separate and independent book a document, joined together at various points in time by a series of editors redactors. Fragmentary hypotheses see the Torah as a collection of small fragments, and supplementary hypotheses as a single core document supplemented by fragments taken from many sources. A version of the documentary hypothesis, frequently identified with the German scholar Julius Wellhausen, was almost universally accepted for most of the 2. As a result, there has been a revival of interest in fragmentary and supplementary approaches, frequently in combination with each other and with a documentary model, making it difficult to classify contemporary theories as strictly one or another. Free Download Genesis Framework Hypothesis' title='Free Download Genesis Framework Hypothesis' />Modern scholars increasingly see the completed Torah as a product of the time of the Achaemenid Empire probably 4. BCE, although some would place its production in the Hellenistic period 3. BCE or even the Hasmonean dynasty 1. BCE. Of its constituent sources, Deuteronomy is generally dated between the 7th and 5th centuries there is much discussion of the unity, extent, nature, and date of the Priestly material. Deuteronomy continues to be seen as having had a history separate from the first four books, and there is a growing recognition that Genesis developed apart from the Exodus stories until joined to it by the Priestly writer. Free Download Genesis Framework Hypothesis' title='Free Download Genesis Framework Hypothesis' />Basic approaches documentary, fragmentary and supplementary hypotheseseditThe Torah or Pentateuch is the collective name for the first five books of the Bible Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. According to tradition they were dictated by God to Moses, but when modern critical scholarship began to be applied to the Bible it was discovered that the Pentateuch was not the unified text one would expect from a single author. As a result, the Mosaic authorship of the Torah had been largely rejected by leading scholars by the 1. Note 2In the mid 1. In 1. 78. 0 Johann Eichhorn, building on the work of the French doctor and exeget Jean Astrucs Conjectures and others, formulated the older documentary hypothesis the idea that Genesis was composed by combining two identifiable sources, the Jehovist J also called the Yahwist and the Elohist E. These sources were subsequently found to run through the first four books of the Torah, and the number was later expanded to three when Wilhelm de Wette identified the Deuteronomist as an additional source found only in Deuteronomy D. Later still the Elohist was split into Elohist and Priestly P sources, increasing the number to four. These documentary approaches were in competition with two other models, the fragmentary and the supplementary. The fragmentary hypothesis argued that fragments of varying lengths, rather than continuous documents, lay behind the Torah this approach accounted for the Torahs diversity but could not account for its structural consistency, particularly regarding chronology. The supplementary hypothesis was better able to explain this unity it maintained that the Torah was made up of a central core document, the Elohist, supplemented by fragments taken from many sources. Microsoft Word Symbol Font here. The supplementary approach was dominant by the early 1. Hermann Hupfeld in 1. Pentateuch was made up of four documentary sources, the Priestly, Yahwist, and Elohist intertwined in Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers, and the stand alone source of Deuteronomy. Hotspot Shield V2 83. At around the same period Karl Heinrich Graf argued that the Yahwist and Elohist were the earliest sources and the Priestly source the latest, while Wilhelm Vatke linked the four to an evolutionary framework, the Yahwist and Elohist to a time of primitive nature and fertility cults, the Deuteronomist to the ethical religion of the Hebrew prophets, and the Priestly source to a form of religion dominated by ritual, sacrifice and law. Table documentary, fragmentary and supplementary hypotheseseditThe table is based on that in Walter Houstons The Pentateuch, with expansions as indicated. Note that the three hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. Download De Filmes A Praia Dublado. Hypothesis. Method of composition. Agency redactorcollectorauthorMode of analysis. Strengths and weaknesses. Documentary. A small number of continuous documents traditionally four combined to form one continuous final text. Combined by editors who altered as little as possible of the texts available to them. Source criticism. Explains both the unity of the Torah due to the unity of the constituent documents and its diversity due to disagreementsrepetitions between them. Difficulty distinguishing J from E outside Genesis. Greatest weakness is the role of the redactors editors, who seem to function as a deus ex machina to explain away difficulties. Supplementary. Produced by the successive addition of layers of supplementary material to a core text or group of texts. Editors are also authors, creating original narrative and interpretation. Redaction criticism. Accounts for the structural consistency of the Pentateuch better than the fragmentary approach, the central core explaining its unity of theme and structure, the fragments embedded in this its diversity of language and style. Fragmentary. The combination of a large number of short texts. Editors also create linking narrative. Form criticism. Has difficulty accounting for the structural consistency of the Pentateuch, especially its chronology. Julius Wellhausen and the documentary hypothesiseditIn 1. Julius Wellhausen published Geschichte Israels, Bd 1 History of Israel, Vol 1 the second edition he printed as Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels Prolegomena to the History of Israel, in 1. The second volume, a synthetic history titled Israelitische und jdische Geschichte Israelite and Jewish History, did not appear until 1. Crucially, this historical portrait was based upon two earlier works of his technical analysis Die Composition des Hexateuchs The Composition of the Hexateuch of 1. JudgesKings in his 1. Friedrich Bleeks Einleitung in das Alte Testament Introduction to the Old Testament. Wellhausens documentary hypothesis owed little to Wellhausen himself but was mainly the work of Hupfeld, Eduard Eugne Reuss, Graf, and others, who in turn had built on earlier scholarship. He accepted Hupfelds four sources and, in agreement with Graf, placed the Priestly work last. J was the earliest document, a product of the 9. Solomon E was from the 8th century BCE in the northern Kingdom of Israel, and had been combined by a redactor editor with J to form a document JE D, the third source, was a product of the 7th century BC, by 6.